Free tool
Testimonial request generator
Ask a manager, supervisor or colleague for a testimonial in a clear, fair way. The tool drafts the request; your referee writes the testimonial in their own words.
Testimonial request letter
Not legal advice, and no outcome prediction. This free tool helps you organise your own thinking and evidence. It does not assess your case or predict what a regulator or panel will decide. Your answers stay in this browser only. Take advice from your defence organisation, union or a solicitor before you submit anything.
Loading the tool…
A testimonial request letter for fitness to practise, drafted in minutes
This free generator builds a testimonial request letter for fitness to practise cases. You add your name and role, your regulator, the stage you are at, the referee's name and how they know you, and a short factual summary of the concerns. You then tick what you would like them to comment on. The letter updates as you type, and you can copy it into an email, print it, save it as a PDF or download it as a text file.
The letter does one job: it asks for a testimonial and tells the referee what a useful one contains. It never writes the testimonial itself. Panels want to hear what someone has seen of your practice, in that person's own words, so the wording has to come from them.
Everything you type stays in your own browser. Nothing is sent to us, and the Delete button removes it from this device. If you are working through the remediation pathway, the same letter appears in its testimonials step, already set to your regulator.
Why the way you ask matters
Regulators and tribunals read testimonials as evidence about you now, not as character praise. A few points come up again and again in their published guidance:
- The author should know about the concerns. A glowing reference from someone who does not know why you are under review tells a panel very little. The letter includes your short summary of the concerns and says plainly that the referee should be aware of them.
- Verified, first-hand accounts weigh more. Testimonials that can be verified, from people who know about the concern, are generally more useful. For doctors, MPTS tribunals have used the Guidance for MPTS tribunals since 24 November 2025; check its current wording on testimonials with your representative.
- Objective evidence of change counts. Social Work England's impairment and sanctions guidance says remediation is best shown through objective evidence, such as completed training, appraisals and practice feedback. The NMC asks whether a concern has been addressed and whether repetition is highly unlikely, and testimonials about your current practice can speak to both.
A well-structured request makes it easier for a busy colleague to give you something a panel can actually use: who they are, how they know you, what they have seen, and that they know why it matters.
- Index and chronologyWhat happened and what you have done since, in date order.
- Reflective statementsYour own account of what you learned and changed.
- CertificatesCourses completed, with dates and what each covered.
- TestimonialsSigned, dated, from people who know the concerns.
- CPD logRelevant learning with notes on how you applied it.
- Action planWhat you will keep doing so it does not happen again.
What the letter asks your referee to include
The generated letter asks each referee to cover the details a decision maker looks for, and leaves the substance to them:
- their full name, role and organisation, and their professional registration number if they have one;
- how long, and in what capacity, they have known you;
- what they have seen themselves, for example your clinical practice and competence, communication with patients or service users and families, teamwork, honesty and integrity, record keeping, or changes since the concerns were raised (you choose which topics to list);
- their contact details, a signature and a date, on headed paper if possible.
It also asks them to be honest and to write only what they can stand behind. A balanced testimonial that mentions an area you are still working on is often more believable than one with no limits at all. You can add a date by which you would like to receive it.
A checklist for each testimonial you receive
Below the letter, the tool shows a short checklist. Before you file a testimonial, check that the author says they know about the concerns, gives their role and contact details, explains how they know you, describes what they have seen in their own words, and has signed and dated it.
Who to ask, and when
Ask people who see your practice now: a line manager, clinical or educational supervisor, practice manager, senior colleague, or a colleague from another profession who works alongside you. Testimonials from friends or family rarely help in a fitness to practise setting unless the panel is looking at something outside work, and your representative can advise on that.
Give people time. Most referees need several weeks to write something careful, and some will need to check with their own employer first. If you have a hearing or decision date, our hearing timeline planner suggests sending requests about nine weeks before it. Send each referee a personal letter rather than a group email, and never press anyone who declines.
What to leave out
Keep the summary of the concerns short and factual. Leave out anything that could identify a patient, service user or colleague. Do not draft the testimonial for the referee or suggest the exact words. A panel can usually tell when testimonials share the same phrasing, and that weakens all of them.
How testimonials fit with your other evidence
Testimonials are one part of a wider picture. Decision makers usually look for insight into what went wrong, steps you have taken to address it, and reflection on how your practice has changed. A typical evidence bundle also includes a reflective statement, certificates from targeted learning, a CPD record and an action plan.
- Check where you stand first with the remediation readiness check; it has a testimonials section and lists your gaps.
- Write your own account with the reflective statement builder, which uses regulator-specific prompts and flags details that might identify someone.
- Keep your learning in date order with the CPD and revalidation tracker.
- See which courses address your concern in our course bundles.
All our free tools are for organising your own evidence. They are not legal advice and they do not predict any outcome; panels make their own decisions. If you have a letter from your regulator, speak to your defence organisation, union or a solicitor before you submit anything.
More free tools
Remediation readiness check
A self-assessment of your insight, remediation, reflection, testimonials, CPD and risk of repetition, with the gaps to work on.
Reflective statement builder
Regulator-specific prompts that help you structure a reflective statement in your own words.
CPD and revalidation tracker
Log CPD against your regulator's cycle and see what is still to do before renewal or revalidation.
Hearing timeline planner
Work back from a key date to a realistic plan for courses, reflection and testimonials, with a calendar file.
Which course do I need?
Four quick questions that point you to the courses that match your regulator and situation.
Frequently asked questions
Does this tool write the testimonial for my referee?
No. It drafts the request letter only. The testimonial must be written by your referee, in their own words, about what they have seen themselves.
Should my referee know about the concerns?
Yes. A testimonial from someone who does not know about the concerns is likely to carry little weight. The letter includes your short factual summary and says the referee should be aware of it.
Is anything I type sent to Healthcare Practise UK?
No. The letter is built in your browser and saved only on your device. You can delete it at any time with the delete button.
Who makes a good referee?
Someone who sees your current practice, such as a manager, supervisor or senior colleague. Ask your representative if you are unsure whether a particular person is suitable.
How many testimonials do I need?
No regulator sets a fixed number in the guidance we cite. Quality and relevance matter more than volume. Your representative can advise on what suits your case.
Can I use the letter for a character reference for an NMC hearing?
Yes. The letter works for any of the nine UK regulators we cover. Choose the NMC as your regulator and the wording adjusts.
Not sure where to start?
Tell us your regulator and the concern. The pathway shows the courses that fit, helps you write your reflection and puts your evidence in order. It is free and nothing leaves your browser.